"... nothing intellectually compelling or challenging.. bald assertions coupled to superstition... woefully pathetic"
The "story" was about the Twitter feed comments surrounding the Lewinsky affair impacting 2016 for Hillary.The "phone" was used for less than 10% of the interview. I suggest that this vid is a poor example of your argument.
What argument? And why the "quotation" marks?!
Keep it clean. Try to be nice. If you are Anonymous, please consider providing a "handle" inside your comment. Thanks.
The "story" was about the Twitter feed comments surrounding the Lewinsky affair impacting 2016 for Hillary.
ReplyDeleteThe "phone" was used for less than 10% of the interview.
I suggest that this vid is a poor example of your argument.
What argument?
ReplyDeleteAnd why the "quotation" marks?!