"... nothing intellectually compelling or challenging.. bald assertions coupled to superstition... woefully pathetic"
An alternate view on the outcome of the debate.... perhaps a more accurate perspective on the results.http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/12/another_debate_with_creationis.php#commentsArea
Waldo: Thanks for the link."Another debate with creationists"The debaters are not creationists. If the author can't get that basic fact straight, I wouldn't put much confidence in the rest of what he said.
Plus, the fact that this guy is arguing on the grounds of reason and logic puts him on theistic ground -- both are incomprehensible and absurd in an arational, illogical, uncreated world.
You can be an atheist -- but you can only be so on the foundation of theism. As I've said before, "atheists owe God a lot".
Post a Comment